Comments on: Liberty and Socialism Cannot Co-exist! http://www.ldsliberty.org/liberty-and-socialism-cannot-co-exist/ Advancing the cause of liberty in light of the restored gospel. Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:55:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Matt Wadsworth http://www.ldsliberty.org/liberty-and-socialism-cannot-co-exist/#comment-5202 Matt Wadsworth Sun, 09 Oct 2011 02:30:51 +0000 http://ldsliberty.org/?p=159#comment-5202 Great article. Free choice and the election into a socialist society is a good point, and it is the essential distinction between the new world order and satan's counterpart. Consider that liberty cannot coexist with any type of marxism is because of the fundamental characterization of property rights. For liberty to exist property rights are "inalienable" meaning they come from God and are above democratic or any type of human rule. Notice the gradual deterioration of this over time. Marxism is the destruction of individual property rights and all property rights-of any kind-are subject to the whims of everyone else. Our country as a whole has already been conditioned to accept Marxism, but the transfer is not complete yet-notice the rejection of our first overt Marxist in Obama. The rhetoric around taxing the rich shows that complete Marxism isn't too far off. The whole "rich should pay their share" is the expression that personal property rights that were once inalienable are now subject to democratic rule, which means that the future of the country is now subject to the moral standards of the general public. The more immoral our country will become the more Marxist it will become, and the more that property rights will erode. These are not coincidences. Lawyer Matt Wadsworth is a partner at Arnold & Wadsworth serving the Salt Lake City and Ogden Utah areas. Great article. Free choice and the election into a socialist society is a good point, and it is the essential distinction between the new world order and satan’s counterpart. Consider that liberty cannot coexist with any type of marxism is because of the fundamental characterization of property rights. For liberty to exist property rights are “inalienable” meaning they come from God and are above democratic or any type of human rule. Notice the gradual deterioration of this over time. Marxism is the destruction of individual property rights and all property rights-of any kind-are subject to the whims of everyone else.

Our country as a whole has already been conditioned to accept Marxism, but the transfer is not complete yet-notice the rejection of our first overt Marxist in Obama. The rhetoric around taxing the rich shows that complete Marxism isn’t too far off. The whole “rich should pay their share” is the expression that personal property rights that were once inalienable are now subject to democratic rule, which means that the future of the country is now subject to the moral standards of the general public. The more immoral our country will become the more Marxist it will become, and the more that property rights will erode. These are not coincidences.

Lawyer Matt Wadsworth is a partner at Arnold & Wadsworth serving the Salt Lake City and Ogden Utah areas.

]]>